Many factors determine which saplings ultimately become canopy trees, but trees that do not show up in the sapling layer will never join the forest canopy. What are the long-term implications of increasing pawpaw dominance in the forest understory? Although we don’t have a firm answer to this question just yet, we do know that the mix of tree species in the forest understory influences the long-term trajectory of the forest canopy. Pawpaw are not strongly fire-adapted (unlike other common canopy dominates, such as oaks), and they likely benefit from the lack of fire in contemporary forests.įigure 2. Indeed, NCRN’sįorest data show that pawpaw sapling density is increasing across the region, while the density of some deer-preferred species (e.g., red maple and black gum) is decreasing (Figure 2).Īnother potential contributor to the success of pawpaw is the suppression of fires that were an important part of the disturbance regime in many eastern forests before European settlement. As a result, we might expect to see pawpaw becoming more common in forest understories that are heavily impacted by deer browse (which describes most NCR forests). Second, frequent deer browse on sapling and shrub species preferred by deer suppresses the growth of these species, clearing the way for pawpaw. First, small pawpaws don’t need to allocate energy to recovering from browse, and instead can put that energy towards growth and reproduction. This deer behavior benefits pawpaw in two ways. The browse rate is strikingly different for pawpaw (which represents 21% of all saplings) with less than 1% showing signs of deer browse and greater than 99% being browse-free! Out of 2,480 saplings recorded in the most recent sampling period, 27% showed signs of deer browse. Deer avoidance of pawpaw is evident in NCRN forest data. Instead, they preferentially browse species such as spicebush ( Lindera benzoin), oaks ( Quercus spp.), red maple ( Acer rubrum), and blackgum ( Nyssa sylvatica). Deer find pawpaw foliage unpalatable and, therefore, avoid browsing pawpaw seedlings and saplings. This phenomenon appears to be driven, at least in part, by patterns of deer browse. In recent decades, naturalists have noted the expansion of pawpaw from well-drained, lowland habitats into drier, upland forests. Sapling density by park: All species versus pawpaw Habitat Expansion & Understory Domination This distribution is likely a reflection of the amount of preferred pawpaw habitat in each park, but may also be related to other ecological processes.įigure 1. Pawpaw is the most common sapling species in C&O Canal (CHOH), GW Memorial Parkway (GWMP), Harpers Ferry (HAFE), and National Capital Parks - East (NACE), and ranks as the second most common sapling species at Antietam (ANTI), and Monocacy (MONO). While NCRN forest monitoring shows pawpaw to be the most common sapling in the region, some parks have many more pawpaw saplings than others (Figure 1). (Note: National park regulations on activities like foraging are found in the superintendent's compendium for each park.) Still, pawpaw fruit can often be found by closely surveying the ground underneath a fruiting tree. Opossums, foxes, squirrels, raccoons, and birds are all known to enjoy pawpaw and are likely to be closely watching for ripe fruits. Nonetheless, pawpaw’s pollinators (which include flies and beetles) inevitably pollinate some flowers, and fruit-hunters may eventually find a tree with fruit. Instead, to produce fruit, a pawpaw flower must receive pollen from flowers on another tree, and sometimes this “other tree” is farther away than it may appear at first glance! Although pawpaws frequently grow in clusters (think pawpaw patch), the trees in a patch are often genetically identical and connected underground by roots (and thus, in biological terms, are a single plant). Pawpaw is self-incompatible, which means that pollen produced on a plant cannot pollinate flowers on the same plant. In spite of pawpaw’s prevalence in NCR forests, successfully foraging for its fruits can be a challenge. The fruit has the ungainly appearance of a small green potato and may occur in clusters on the tree. The flavor of pawpaw fruit is often compared to bananas, but with hints of mango, vanilla, and citrus. One of the most tasty late-season rewards for hikers and wildlife alike is the pawpaw fruit, which begins to ripen in late summer and peaks in September and October.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |